Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:12:27 -0000, Stephan Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having said that, I feel very strongly that built Zope version 3 and
nothing
more or less. And I feel that a name change would betray me and my
intentions.
Well, Joel didn't suggest a name change, he suggested adding a
codename to signify that there was something new and exciting, over
and beyond Zope 2 and all the stigma attached to it, and spend a bit
of time letting the world know that there is a wonderful new
framework that has a lot going for it, and you should consider it. I
don't see how this could possibly betray anything, and I think the
Zope community would have a lot to gain from a little more buzz
outside its own confines.
You seem to refactor the code all the time, why are you so resitant
to refactoring the brand just a little? :-)
Not calling it Zope would be a mistake, but how about adding a qualifier
to the name. Like microsoft did with Windows "NT"
eg. Zope DR aka "Zope Done Right"
The difference between Z2 and Z3 is really so great that it is not just
an upgrade of the same technology.
--
hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark
http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Science
_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
