On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:08:48 -0600, Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I might be reading more into his words than was intended, but I think
>> this demonstrates the problem. Distributing multiple requests for one
>> section across multiple servers is (what I consider to be)
>> undesirable.
>
>You can actually do it either way. Curtis (AIUI) complained that the
>method described meant your site depended upon each of th esection's
>servers being up, that there was no redundancy. So I described a way of
>doing it with redundancy.
What you described doesn't scale up to having 1000's of sections
(which I was assuming, and I think Curtis was too). If this isn't a
problem, then your solution is great.
>EddieWare does do 'intellgient' caching
eddieware is on my list of option to try out next month... Ill keep
you posted
Toby Dickenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
