On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:52:36PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote at 2005-5-25 21:03 +0100:
> > ...
> >> I strongly argue against it. Fix "hasattr" in the Zope context,
> >> instead!
> >Make it so! :-)
> _marker = 
> def hasattr(obj, attr, marker):
> a = getattr(obj, attr, _marker)
> return a is not _marker
> import __builtin__
> __builtin__.hasattr = hasattr
> Easy enough, isn't it?
Are you currently running zope with a patch like this?
Have you noticed any performance difference?
the zope 2.6 source code contains over 700 calls to hasattr()...
> Now, there need only to be someone who checks it in.
Well, first I think it should be discussed on zope-dev...
unless it already has been? I'll post a message there.
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -