Andrew Milton wrote:
-1 for any scheme that deliberately breaks currently working code / installs.

It's pretty broken already ;)

-1 for any scheme that involves diddling the ZODB to 'fix' pickles, because
   you just know you're going to corrupt someone's ZODB, and that's just
   noone's idea of fun.

Yup, I'd agree with this...

Didn't see any mention of fixing ZClasses (not sure if that's an issue).

Hahaha. You'rea funny man ;-)



Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting

Zope maillist  -
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to