Andrew Milton wrote:
-1 for any scheme that deliberately breaks currently working code / installs.
It's pretty broken already ;)
-1 for any scheme that involves diddling the ZODB to 'fix' pickles, because
you just know you're going to corrupt someone's ZODB, and that's just
noone's idea of fun.
Yup, I'd agree with this...
Didn't see any mention of fixing ZClasses (not sure if that's an issue).
Hahaha. You'rea funny man ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
