Or just do a custom tpValues equivalent for the particular special case. I suspect that is what we will try next... ;-)
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Chris Withers wrote: > Dennis Allison wrote: > > LocalFS product (1.3-andreas) seems to be having a problem with the > > <dtml-tree> tag in Zope 2.9.2/Python 2.4.2. > > Then don't use DTML, it does, after all suck (tm) ;-) > > > The problem seems to be with the tpValues() program in the LocalFS product > > which returns an empty list. > > then tpValues() is likely wrong for localfs, unless localfs doesn't want > to play ball with the tree tag. Given that the tree tag is used by the > zmi, and you don't really want to display potentially millions of > sub-objects in the zmi, it might be perfectly legitimate for local-fs to > do what it's doing... > > > There seems to be some trickery going on with the isPrincipiaFolderish > > and the tree_view attributes, but I don't quite get what's supposed to > > happen. SmileyChris? I think these were your mods. > > Not me, I don't smile, but you knew that already ;-) > > > Incidentally, the ZMI panel which uses <dtml-tree> seems to have the same > > sort of problems I am seeing when there is a LocalFS. > > See my comments above. > > I'd roll your own code without using dtml and just iterate over the > objectIds method... > > cheers, > > Chris > > -- _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )