Jim Fulton wrote: > We and canonical use the Zope Framework. We don't use an > application. Zope (aka Zope 2) is an extensible application. We (ZC > and Canonical and others) assemble components from the Zope Framework > to build our own applications.
Hmm, maybe I got this wrong, but Gary Poster expressed a strong concern that "zope 3 the app server" needed to keep living. I do think the name "Zope" should never be used on its own again. I think "Zope Classic" would certainly work for "Zope 2 the app server", it conveys the right things: - mature - stable - maybe not the best choice for new development. cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )