Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > the FAQ should then reply in two sentences or less: "the reason for that > > behaviour is this blah blah ... click here to read more URL/TO/GUIDE" > > -1, it's already hard to maintain the vast amount of information. Trying > to keep in sync yet another layer of indirection is an overkill. Instead > an effort should be put at improving the existing information. And the > search engine should be useful at finding it.
i can see it's another layer but it is perhaps also fewer mails in your inbox :) isn't it very normal for the people who ask questions to go to a FAQ just before they send their question ? about searching. i also like the FAQ to be in the downloadble pdf - there's no quality search engine in my pdf reader. im sitting in the train having printed the whole documentaion and ask myself "does apache require a restart if i'm doing a change in this bit of code". also the very fact that you bring up the "search" step, cries for FAQ. a user have to type a searchword, enter submit, and read through 70 Results for [cache] for example. ./a --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
