On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:47:27 pm Mark Waser wrote: > >> list readers should check old discredited approaches first > > Would you really call Schank discredited or is it just that his line of > research petered out?
I think Schank's stuff was quite sound at its level but was abstract enough (at the level that it was right) to have a gap between it and the ability of the GOFAI infrastructure to implement. Note that this is a generally valid concern with quite a few of the things we need at the higher levels of organization of an AGI. Josh ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
