On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found the paper. > > As I guessed, their update operator is defined on the whole > probability distribution function, rather than on a single probability > value of an event. I don't think it is practical for AGI --- we cannot > afford the time to re-evaluate every belief on each piece of new > evidence. Also, I haven't seen a convincing argument on why an > intelligent system should follow the ME Principle. > I agree their method is not practical for most cases in AGI, which is why we didn't use it within PLN ;-) ... we use a simpler revision rule... > Also this paper doesn't directly solve my example, because it doesn't > use second-order probability. That is true, but it could be straightforwardly extended to that case... Ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
