--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is how I see this exchange... > > You proposed a so-called *mathematical* "debunking" of RSI. > > I presented some detailed arguments against this so-called debunking, > pointing out that its mathematical assumptions and its quantification of > improvement bear little relevance to real-world AI now or in the future.
I can only disprove a mathematical argument. I think I have disproved RSI based on a model of self introspection without input. If you want to allow input, then you need to make a clear distinction between self improvement and learning. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
