Sorry, double negatives confuse me. I mean of course that the history of the twentieth century (Marxist-Leinism, communism, fascism etc.) is an argument against the efficiency of the market in social science.
alex Alex Tabarrok wrote: > Hello? If the history of the twentieth century is not an undeniable > argument against the hypothesis that the "market" for social science is > not efficient then what is? > > Alex > -- > Dr. Alexander Tabarrok > Vice President and Director of Research > The Independent Institute > 100 Swan Way > Oakland, CA, 94621-1428 > Tel. 510-632-1366, FAX: 510-568-6040 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
