Maybe so Dilip, but it looks terrible! While the world looks up to America's 
scientific might, we put these buffoons to represent us. It demonstrates a 
certain attitude, one that is eating American basic education out from the 
guts. Not good!


On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Dilip Deka <dilipd...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Think of the reason why the science committee gets such members.
> To start with, science is not an attractive subject in USA. So, anything to 
> do with science gets lower ranking than say economy, finance, health,social 
> security etc. Thus, the science committee does not attract the star players. 
> The rejects who do not get selected to any other committee opt for the likes 
> of science committee.The common man does not care what rubbish the science 
> committee puts out or what the members utter in the name of science. The 
> importance of a committee is measured in terms of how many dollars it 
> influences.
> Dilip
> =======================================================================
> 
> --- On Tue, 11/13/12, Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Assam] Hot News from USA
>> To: "A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world" 
>> <assam@assamnet.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2012, 9:42 PM
>> If it is not theater of the absurd, I
>> can't imagine what would be! 
>> Faat diya boxumoti paatale' lukaon! ( Please Mother earth,
>> split asunder, so I can hide from this shame).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:35 PM, amlan saha <a.s...@alumni.tufts.edu>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ah, the ever amusing Science Committee, which counts
>> among its members the
>>> likes of
>>> 
>>>    - *Todd Akin* - "If it’s a
>> legitimate rape, the female body has ways to
>>>    try to shut that whole thing down.”
>>>    - *Paul Broun* - “All that stuff I
>> was taught about evolution and
>>>    embryology and the Big Bang Theory,
>> all that is lies straight from the pit
>>>    of Hell,”
>>>    - *Roscoe Bartlett* - “There are
>> very few pregnancies as a result of
>>>    rape, fortunately, and incest —
>> compared to the usual abortion, what is the
>>>    percentage of abortions for rape? It
>> is tiny. It is a tiny, tiny
>>>    percentage.”
>>>    - *Randy Neugebauer* - "join together
>> in prayer to humbly seek fair
>>>    weather conditions” after several
>> destructive tornadoes and droughts.
>>>    - *Dana Rohrabacher* - “We don’t
>> know what those other cycles [of global
>>>    warming] were caused by in the past.
>> Could be dinosaur flatulence, you
>>>    know, or who knows?”
>>>    - *Jim Sensenbrenner* - railed against
>> "scientific fascism" and called
>>>    climate change research an
>> "international conspiracy".
>>>    - *Sandy Adams* - voted in favor of a
>> bill to teach theories that
>>>    contradict the theory of evolution.
>>> 
>>> Rohrabacher and Sensenbrenner are now in the running to
>> take the gavel of
>>> the Committee in the 113th Congress!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> He is still a Congressman you know, lame duck as he
>> is.  But it is
>>> appalling to see the pea-brained people that are in the
>> Science
>>> Subcommittee. It is a pathetic joke.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:02 PM, "Alpana B.
>> Sarangapani" <
>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I meant - if it were a hot topic, then!. : )
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I can see why Bobby Jindal is
>> urging HIS people to “stop being the
>>> stupid party” .
>>>>> 
>>>>> What about him, in spite of being Rhodes
>> Scholar being a gung-ho
>>> supporter of the NRA?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I thought Todd Akin lost. Can he still serve at
>> a (any) Congressional
>>> Committee?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:20 PM, "Chan Mahanta"
>> <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I didn't get that, A.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, "Alpana B.
>> Sarangapani" <
>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But that would have made India's cases
>> similar to that, stronger,
>>> don't you think, C-da? : )
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:58 PM, "Chan
>> Mahanta" <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Oh, darn A!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Looks like I had been losing sleep
>> over nothing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But anyway, it was fun reading
>> about it. Where else can we get such
>>> interesting news from? I mean
>>>>>>>> other than Missouri. Did you
>> know  our very own Todd Akin serves at
>>> the Congressional Science Sub-committee?
>>>>>>>> I can see why Bobby Jindal is
>> urging HIS people to “stop being the
>>> stupid party” .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Used to think that India had
>> problems, you know?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:44 PM,
>> "Alpana B. Sarangapani" <
>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It has (or is) never been a hot
>> topic even to think or discuss
>>> about it, let alone be tensed about it. : )
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:29 PM,
>> "Chan Mahanta" <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I am greatly relieved to
>> share a terrific piece of news that many
>>> of us Markhowas have been sweating under since November
>> 6: That the leader
>>> of the Secessionist movement from Texas is a real
>> Gandhian, says "---We
>>> walk in the same vein as Gandhi and those guys"
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For more on it, look up:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Read more:
>>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83776.html#ixzz2C8161Xxo
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Now my question to our
>> friends from Texas is if they too are
>>> equally relieved.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> cm :-)
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> PS: I understand that Texas
>> Governor 'Oops' Perry, once a
>>> secessionist himself, will not back the new freedom
>> seekers.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam@assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam@assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to