Very well said, Santanu.

On Nov 14, 2012, at 9:55 AM, "Roy, Santanu" <s...@mail.smu.edu> wrote:

> Hi Chandan-da,
> Of course, it has a huge downside. As a whole, federal spending on research 
> has suffered huge cuts over the years. It is the easiest to cut; there is no 
> clear political constituency that objects (unless it is funding for military 
> purposes that come with huge kick backs).  The allocation of this spending 
> has also been suboptimal as the lack of funding for stem cell research 
> suggests, but the actual impact of that pales in comparison to the impact of 
> shrinking research budget size. 
> Research and higher education have been the primary engines of US prosperity 
> and growth; but more than that, the US leadership here has defined the 
> frontier for the rest of the world for about a century (most of the world has 
> been free riding in a sense). As the US declines, its profitable economic 
> activities might move elsewhere;, but I see no hope that achievements in 
> basic research will be taken up by any of the rising Asian stars. It is much 
> easier for other economies to adopt technology, to  do product and process 
> innovation, to apply basic research and make money. It is much harder to 
> build up institutions that create incentives for doing seemingly useless 
> fundamental research. Yet the latter is the foundation on which all 
> technological progress rests. The epoch of western civilization - white 
> peoples' intellectual journey -  that began in the Italian city states in the 
> middle ages may finally be coming to an end; the emegence of darkness in the 
> minds of its last frontier in America may simply be a reflection of that. 
> Santanu. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: assam [mailto:assam-boun...@assamnet.org] On Behalf Of Chan Mahanta
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:55 AM
> To: A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world
> Subject: Re: [Assam] Hot News from USA
> 
> Never thought of it that way Santanu. While it does make some profoundly 
> cynical sense, there is a downside to it though: Because these are the people 
> who control the hearings and the pathway to funding of basic research and 
> higher education that the Govt. must do and private enterprise won't.
> 
> 
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:01 AM, "Roy, Santanu" <s...@mail.smu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Dilip-da:
>> I agree with you about the general apathy towards science, but there is 
>> something more too - a hostility towards science in the minds of the 
>> religious fringe (quite a large fringe). They truly believe it to be a dark 
>> art and would like to retain some political control over it. Having these 
>> kind of representatives provides some form of assurance to this section of 
>> the population, and allows government to function with less friction. As 
>> long as these representatives are sufficiently corrupt to compromise on 
>> their "principles" (they always are), they do serve a useful purpose. The 
>> crazies must feel included. 
>> Santanu. 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: assam [assam-boun...@assamnet.org] on behalf of Dilip Deka 
>> [dilipd...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 7:46 AM
>> To: A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the 
>> world
>> Subject: Re: [Assam] Hot News from USA
>> 
>> Think of the reason why the science committee gets such members.
>> To start with, science is not an attractive subject in USA. So, anything to 
>> do with science gets lower ranking than say economy, finance, health,social 
>> security etc. Thus, the science committee does not attract the star players. 
>> The rejects who do not get selected to any other committee opt for the likes 
>> of science committee.The common man does not care what rubbish the science 
>> committee puts out or what the members utter in the name of science. The 
>> importance of a committee is measured in terms of how many dollars it 
>> influences.
>> Dilip
>> ======================================================================
>> =
>> 
>> --- On Tue, 11/13/12, Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Assam] Hot News from USA
>>> To: "A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the 
>>> world" <assam@assamnet.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2012, 9:42 PM If it is not theater of the 
>>> absurd, I can't imagine what would be!
>>> Faat diya boxumoti paatale' lukaon! ( Please Mother earth, split 
>>> asunder, so I can hide from this shame).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:35 PM, amlan saha <a.s...@alumni.tufts.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ah, the ever amusing Science Committee, which counts
>>> among its members the
>>>> likes of
>>>> 
>>>> - *Todd Akin* - "If it's a
>>> legitimate rape, the female body has ways to
>>>> try to shut that whole thing down."
>>>> - *Paul Broun* - "All that stuff I
>>> was taught about evolution and
>>>> embryology and the Big Bang Theory,
>>> all that is lies straight from the pit
>>>> of Hell,"
>>>> - *Roscoe Bartlett* - "There are
>>> very few pregnancies as a result of
>>>> rape, fortunately, and incest -
>>> compared to the usual abortion, what is the
>>>> percentage of abortions for rape? It
>>> is tiny. It is a tiny, tiny
>>>> percentage."
>>>> - *Randy Neugebauer* - "join together
>>> in prayer to humbly seek fair
>>>> weather conditions" after several
>>> destructive tornadoes and droughts.
>>>> - *Dana Rohrabacher* - "We don't
>>> know what those other cycles [of global
>>>> warming] were caused by in the past.
>>> Could be dinosaur flatulence, you
>>>> know, or who knows?"
>>>> - *Jim Sensenbrenner* - railed against
>>> "scientific fascism" and called
>>>> climate change research an
>>> "international conspiracy".
>>>> - *Sandy Adams* - voted in favor of a
>>> bill to teach theories that
>>>> contradict the theory of evolution.
>>>> 
>>>> Rohrabacher and Sensenbrenner are now in the running to
>>> take the gavel of
>>>> the Committee in the 113th Congress!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Chan Mahanta <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> He is still a Congressman you know, lame duck as he
>>> is.  But it is
>>>> appalling to see the pea-brained people that are in the
>>> Science
>>>> Subcommittee. It is a pathetic joke.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:02 PM, "Alpana B.
>>> Sarangapani" <
>>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I meant - if it were a hot topic, then!. : )
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I can see why Bobby Jindal is
>>> urging HIS people to "stop being the
>>>> stupid party" .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What about him, in spite of being Rhodes
>>> Scholar being a gung-ho
>>>> supporter of the NRA?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I thought Todd Akin lost. Can he still serve at
>>> a (any) Congressional
>>>> Committee?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:20 PM, "Chan Mahanta"
>>> <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I didn't get that, A.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, "Alpana B.
>>> Sarangapani" <
>>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But that would have made India's cases
>>> similar to that, stronger,
>>>> don't you think, C-da? : )
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:58 PM, "Chan
>>> Mahanta" <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Oh, darn A!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Looks like I had been losing sleep
>>> over nothing.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But anyway, it was fun reading
>>> about it. Where else can we get such
>>>> interesting news from? I mean
>>>>>>>>> other than Missouri. Did you
>>> know  our very own Todd Akin serves at
>>>> the Congressional Science Sub-committee?
>>>>>>>>> I can see why Bobby Jindal is
>>> urging HIS people to "stop being the
>>>> stupid party" .
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Used to think that India had
>>> problems, you know?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:44 PM,
>>> "Alpana B. Sarangapani" <
>>>> absarangap...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It has (or is) never been a hot
>>> topic even to think or discuss
>>>> about it, let alone be tensed about it. : )
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:29 PM,
>>> "Chan Mahanta" <cmaha...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I am greatly relieved to
>>> share a terrific piece of news that many
>>>> of us Markhowas have been sweating under since November
>>> 6: That the leader
>>>> of the Secessionist movement from Texas is a real
>>> Gandhian, says "---We
>>>> walk in the same vein as Gandhi and those guys"
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> For more on it, look up:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Read more:
>>>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83776.html#ixzz2C8161Xxo
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Now my question to our
>>> friends from Texas is if they too are
>>>> equally relieved.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> cm :-)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I understand that Texas
>>> Governor 'Oops' Perry, once a
>>>> secessionist himself, will not back the new freedom
>>> seekers.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> assam@assamnet.org
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam@assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> assam@assamnet.org
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam@assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam@assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to