Can you _please_ trim the quoted text? There's absolutely no reason to quote the entire post you're replying to, signature lines and all... +2 points for bottom-posting though. :-)
> I still think HTTP is a better option.. There is far more control > available in terms of securing it especially when the description of the > package says " TFTP provides very little security, and should not be > enabled unless it is expressly needed.".. Who in their right mind is putting these phones on the open Internet, and if they're not, then why is TFTP that big a problem? TFTP's actually quite a standard option in most networking equipment for pulling down new configurations and firmware. HTTP doesn't offer much in the way of helping with that. What would be nice is perhaps a little DIP switch on the phone to enable LAN reconfigure/flash for better security... but for me anyway being able to pull the TFTP server and config filenames (global and per-phone) from standard DHCP extensions would be awesome. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users