6.3 INDEPENDENT INSPECTIONS
An independent inspection is required each time a control circuit is 
reconnected. When performing the independent inspection, the inspector must 
check that all parts are correctly attached, that all controls have correct 
safety locking, that the controls move in the correct sense and that there is 
full and free movement.
The minimum qualification for performing Independent Inspections is a Daily 
Inspector Authorisation.

Haven't looked at all of the MOSP, but the above certainly seems to be limited 
to control circuit reconnection and not all elements of reassembly.
I'm sure the Foka in question would have complied with the requirements of 6.3
Not gunna dig down to find my MOSP in the boxes to see if there is more as we a 
busily packing to migrate to Queensland.  :-))  :-))
I'm sure I will be corrected if I have missed something.

Chris


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matthew Gage 
  To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Foka incident


  Tom, I was trying to find a way to say that simply - you saved me the trouble.




  However, looking at the MOSP, I don't see a requirement for a signature for 
an Independent Inspection


  6.2 DAILY INSPECTION
  Before each days' operation and after each rigging all sailplanes must 
receive a Daily Inspection in accordance with the procedures in the GFA Daily 
Inspector's Handbook. This inspection may only be performed by persons who are 
authorised as a Daily Inspector for that particular construction category or in 
the case of powered sailplanes, for that particular type.
  When the Daily Inspection is completed the Inspector certifies so in the 
Daily Inspection Record (GFA Form 1) which is in the same booklet as the 
Maintenance Release.


  6.3 INDEPENDENT INSPECTIONS
  An independent inspection is required each time a control circuit is 
reconnected. When performing the independent inspection, the inspector must 
check that all parts are correctly attached, that all controls have correct 
safety locking, that the controls move in the correct sense and that there is 
full and free movement.
  The minimum qualification for performing Independent Inspections is a Daily 
Inspector Authorisation.




  Matt






  On 17/05/2011, at 11:59 , tom claffey wrote:


    Unfortunately logic does not always win in the law area.
    Just ask Boonah club members what it cost the club when the family of a tug 
pilot sued after the wings came off the tug!
    They hadn't even rigged it and the dead pilot had DI'd it!
    Tom




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Peter F Bradshaw <p...@exadios.com>
    To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
<aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net>
    Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2011 11:10 AM
    Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Foka incident

    Hi Mike;

    On Tue, 17 May 2011, Mike Borgelt wrote:

    > At 10:16 PM 16/05/2011, you wrote:
    > >Hi Ron;
    > >
    > >A lawsuit like what? You are responding to a mail that hypothesizes that
    > >lawsuits are possible. There is no actual lawsuit.
    >
    > Read it again. He didn't say there was, just that there is the
    > possibility in similar situations.

    Hence my use of the word hypothesizes - a word that gives his argument
    more dignity than it deserves.

    >
    > I sure wouldn't try your legal defence. "So are you telling the
    > Court, Sir, that even though you knew there was no way of positively
    > checking, you signed that the aircraft had been rigged correctly?".

    The second signer is not signing that the aircraft has been rigged
    correctly. The signer is stating that he or she has checked the rigging
    in a competent and reasonable manner. This is a different proposition in
    law and in fact.

    I think the lesson to be learnt from this accident is that, as somebody
    else here has noted, that DI tickets should be issued on a per aircraft
    type basis. Plainly, in this case, neither the riggers nor the people
    who checked the rigging knew how to rig or check this particular
    aircraft type.

    >
    > It might even be worse than a civil suit which even if you win is
    > going to cost thousands to tens of thousands of dollars to defend
    > with the loss of time, stress, worry etc. You might run into a
    > coroner or Public prosectuor who wants to make a name for him or
    > herself and find yourself on a criminal charge.

    What is this? Fear Mongering 101? How did we jump from civil lawsuits to
    criminal proceedings?

    The problem with your argument is that it is one best tailored to the
    idea that the best way to live our lives is to enter a windowless room,
    close and lock the door, and sit quietly in the dark.

    The truth of the matter is that each of us perform actions and take
    risks every day in order to live our lives. Any of us may be sued at
    any time. How far the plaintiff gets is a function of the merit of their
    case. The best defense is to perform in a competent and reasonable
    manner.

    Further the best way to operate our sport is to perform in a competent
    and reasonable manner and cross checking is an important part of this
    paradigm.

    >
    > Mike
    > Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments since 
1978
    > phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
    > fax  Int'l + 61 746 358796
    > cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
    >
    > email:  mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com
    > website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
    >

    Cheers

    -- 
    Peter F Bradshaw: http://www.exadios.com (public keys avaliable there).
    Personal site: http://personal.exadios.com
    "I love truth, and the way the government still uses it occasionally to
    keep us guessing." - Sam Kekovich.
    _______________________________________________
    Aus-soaring mailing list
    Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
    To check or change subscription details, visit:
    http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



    _______________________________________________
    Aus-soaring mailing list
    Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
    To check or change subscription details, visit:
    http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Aus-soaring mailing list
  Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
  To check or change subscription details, visit:
  http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to