At 06:46 PM 16/05/2011, you wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002B_01CC13F9.94B0C920"
Content-Language: en-au
Geoff your argument explains precisely why we DO need a second
rigging inspection! Things do get forgotten or missed (especially by
more experienced pilots). I am more than happy to sign off on a
duplicate inspection having made damn sure that it is right, why?
Not because the risk of litigation but because I care about the
safety of my fellow pilots and myself.
It is absolutely clear that a second inspection will
significantly reduce the risk of a mistake.
John Parncutt
So Geoff has run the experiment and because the results don't fit
your pre/mis conceptions you dismiss the observational evidence.
You aren't a "climate scientist" by any chance are you?
Mike
Borgelt Instruments - manufacturers of quality soaring instruments since 1978
phone Int'l + 61 746 355784
fax Int'l + 61 746 358796
cellphone Int'l + 61 428 355784
email: mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com
website: www.borgeltinstruments.com
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
