On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 14:23, Anthony McKale <anthony.mck...@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > yah the feeds aren't https/firewall protected so i'm guessing no one should > mind > or at least it'll be a lesson to them if they didn't want folks accessing > them
If memory serves either the EMP SWF itself or the supporting JS makes use of them, which would require their visibility. I could be wrong, though -- I can't for the life of me recall how I came to believe this to be the case, so I could just be making things up. M. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
