On 28.03.2014, at 17:34, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: > Supporting BIP70 by BitPay or BopShop is a cake since it does no more then > they did without it. > I am not in opposition but see no reason to be enthusiastic about it. I will > once the spec goes > further than what was possible before. > > So, if e.g. Trezor ships a firmware update that uses BIP70 to present signed > payment identities on the screen, would you support it then?
Yes that would be neat and I would not want to spoil the show. I wish the established identity could be re-used though to send and much more.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
