So I take it BOPShop won't be supporting BIP70 then? :(
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Tamas Blummer <ta...@bitsofproof.com>wrote: > I have nothing against incremental development. This will however not pick > up until it offers some incremental benefit compared to current payment > processor solutions, > such as e.g. > > 1. Symmetrical. One can also offer a payment. > 2. Aggregating and Netting. Handle multiple installments and/or net with > previous cash flows. > 3. More secure. One has a check not only on the payment address (which > already has one with https:// in the web shop scenario it is currently > able support) but not on the refund. > > > On 28.03.2014, at 15:01, Gavin Andresen <gavinandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Tamas Blummer <ta...@bitsofproof.com>wrote: > >> May I ask how the current payment protocol is supposed to handle salaries? >> > > It doesn't. > > "walk before you run" and all that; lets see what problems we run into > with the minimal payment protocol we have now (like refund outputs you have > to remember forever) before we create an insurmountable set of problems by > trying to solve everything we can think of all at once. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
