Rick Houkes wrote these words on 10/25/08 09:08 CST: > Whilst using stable BLFS 6.3 and LFS SVN (version since Glibc 2.8 and > GCC 4.3.2 where introduced) I have ran into some problems as some > programs refuse to compile if either or both or these is in use.
Your findings don't surprise me at all. The current LFS development book uses bleeding-edge package versions while BLFS stable is way old. We are aware of all the breakage, problem is manpower to update all the BLFS packages. GNOME in itself is time-consuming enough. Not to mention *everything* else. I suppose I should update the BLFS home page with information about the disparity between LFS SVN and BLFS Stable. It simply won't work without massive package updates to BLFS. -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3992.15] [GNU ld version 2.17] [gcc (GCC) 4.1.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.5] [Linux 2.6.21.5 i686] 09:20:00 up 3 days, 45 min, 5 users, load average: 4.02, 3.53, 2.93 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
