2008/11/5 Rick Houkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/11/2 DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Rick Houkes wrote: >>> 2008/10/25 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> Rick Houkes wrote these words on 10/25/08 09:08 CST: >>>> >>>>> Whilst using stable BLFS 6.3 and LFS SVN (version since Glibc 2.8 and >>>>> GCC 4.3.2 where introduced) I have ran into some problems as some >>>>> programs refuse to compile if either or both or these is in use. >>>>> >>>> Your findings don't surprise me at all. The current LFS development >>>> book uses bleeding-edge package versions while BLFS stable is way >>>> old. >>>> >>>> We are aware of all the breakage, problem is manpower to update all >>>> the BLFS packages. GNOME in itself is time-consuming enough. Not to >>>> mention *everything* else. >>>> >>>> I suppose I should update the BLFS home page with information about >>>> the disparity between LFS SVN and BLFS Stable. It simply won't work >>>> without massive package updates to BLFS. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Randy >>>> >>>> rmlinux: [bogomips 3992.15] [GNU ld version 2.17] [gcc (GCC) 4.1.2] >>>> [GNU C Library stable release version 2.5] [Linux 2.6.21.5 i686] >>>> 09:20:00 up 3 days, 45 min, 5 users, load average: 4.02, 3.53, 2.93 >>>> -- >>>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev >>>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >>>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The information is also more meant for BLFS SVN which still looks >>> pretty much looks like the current stable. I am currently building >>> Gnome 2.24, which (hopefully) wont have these issues. For the rest it >>> would be nice to note that using LFS SVN can cause some packages to >>> fail. >>> >> Thanks for the heads up Rick. As you've already found, if you are >> building against SVN, you are in uncharted territory. While Trac >> tickets and patches to the book's xml are the preferred method of >> delivery, notes, tips, patches, or links sent to BLFS-Dev are still very >> much appreciated. We need all the help we can get. If you find any >> more gotchas during your own trials, please, keep sending them in. >> >> Thanks again. >> >> -- DJ Lucas >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. >> >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> > > I have another one to add to your list. In adding the capability to > burn cd's and dvd's on my {,B}LFS system I have yet ran into another > one: cdrdao 1.2.2. Cdrdao 1.2.2 also refuses to build undet gcc 4.3.x > and make gives a nice error if you do so. Gentoo has again a fix from > this:http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=15167. I think I will > also upload some of the patches to the patches channel of the LFS > project. > > Regards, > > Rick Houkes >
Oops, I just found out seconds ago the link points out to the wrong patch, this is the corrected link: http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=151679, this one provides the correct patch. Regards, Rick Houkes -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
