Hi, On 23/05/2022 14:30, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Can I repeat my request to get a small group (e.g. Paolo, Kendy as representatives of the two opposing sides here) to first agree on a workable process, to quickly iterate the proposal to something we can all support?
First of all, why are you saying that there are opposing sides? Opposing to what?I don't think is a good idea to trying to artificially create a division where there isn't any.
Secondly, why do we need a "small group"?We all did an excellent job together with the community and the team so I don't think anyone would see the necessity of doing things behind closed doors.
It seems like you are stating that the community and the team hasn't done an excellent job and that's regrettable.The current approach via emails does not appear to get us closer to a final result.
If directors choose not to share their proposals, like everyone else, here in the mailing list then some might think they don't want to have their proposals scrutinised as the rest of the document.
If you have seen any major issue with the proposal please to share them with us now or let's proceed with the vote.
Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
