+1 on releasing a beta. Things can always be improved, and IMO it's time to get more people testing / benchmarking the 0.5 codebase, which even where it is still rough is much better than 0.4.
-Jonathan On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Jaakko <rosvopaalli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd propose to wait for a short while (until Monday or so). I think > there are some issues with bootstrapping (discussed with Jonathan > yesterday) and some of the things in CHANGES.txt are currently not > true. I'm working on bootstrap/move issues currently, so I'd propose > to wait to fix most obvious of them before giving trunk any "official" > beta status. > > Also, it would be nice to have proactive repair in as well. > > Best regards, > -Jaakko > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: >> >> We've just about worked our way through the list of 0.5.0 blockers and >> it would be great to get some of this new hotness into the hands of our >> users, so... >> >> I propose the following tag and artifacts for 0.5.0-beta1 >> >> SVN Tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.5.0-beta1 >> 0.5.0-beta1 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans >> >> [1] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.5.0-beta1/CHANGES.txt >> >> -- >> Eric Evans >> eev...@rackspace.com >> >
