----- Message d'origine -----De: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 
Lundi, Novembre 12, 2007 9:25 pmObjet: Re: [CentOS] Need advice on storageÀ: 
CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>> Guy, > > I don't think raptor hard 
drives are necessarily value for money > and in your case, I believe that you'd 
be *much* better served > with some sort of redundancy and not just plain old 
striping. > > I'd recommend that you stick with software raid and do something 
> like this; > > > 1 x silicon image PCI 4 port sata controller *not hardware 
raid* > ($25 from ebay for example) > 3 x 320gb sata hdd (~ $100 each here in 
Australia) > > for a total of $325 AUD you'd get around 640gb or redundant > 
storage. > > > 2 x 74gb raptors will cost you $400 here in Australia ..... so > 
thats $75 *more* for almost 400gb *less* storage that is *not* > redundant ! > 
> Linux software raid-5 performance is pretty good, my 4 x 400gb > sata's show 
155mb/s reads with 'hdparm -t'. > > No brainer ! > > Cheers, > > > Brian. > Hi 
Brian,  Thanks for your response.  I didn't say it but i can't go more than 2 
drives (no more space in the case) and i backup the entire "mail drive" on a 
LVM backup array of 1.2 TB (3 drives) that serves to backup a windows file 
server too (Backup Array is 3 drives).  It's not a perfect solution but it 
cames like it is because the Linux server took more and more job over the 
years.  The Windoze servers do file serving + AD and Terminal Server.  They 
have both server grade hardware but this little CentOS 4.5 server running on 
cheap hardware does almost all the job!  As for RAID 5, with the *poor* CPU i 
have (Athlon 2500+), i'd be curious how fast it could write with multiples 
"streams" (server supports 45 WS).  Don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that 
what you said is not right nor this isn't a good idea!  I'm waiting a budget to 
change the server but it seems that for now, i have to search a temporary 
solution that could provide the most speed for the money and taking into 
account i'm dealing with low end mainboard / cpu.  The next server should be 
something like the Tyan Transport TA26 (though doesn't seem to have redundant 
PS) with something like an Adaptec 3085 and SAS 15K Drives.Thanks again for 
your input!Guy Boisvert
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to