On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, lpetit <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You should consider using docstrings for documenting functions
Good suggestion. I've changed my code to do that. I also noticed that I had forgotten to replace special characters with built-in entities in my HTML, so that is fixed now. The new version is at http://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureSnake.html. What else would you do different in this code? Do you think it still contains too many comments? > On 29 déc, 16:45, "Mark Volkmann" <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Mark Volkmann >> >> >> >> <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I would like to produce a version of the snake code that could serve >> > as an example of the kind of code that the Clojure community thinks is >> > "good". Unless it's part of an exercise to produce the shortest code >> > possible, I think we should always write Clojure code with a goal of >> > making it as easy as possible for others to read, while not attempting >> > to serve as a Clojure tutorial. Again, my goal here is to get more >> > developers to give Clojure a shot. >> >> > My challenge to everyone on the list is to start with any version of >> > the snake code you've seen and make it as readable as *you* think it >> > should be by doing things like renaming variables and functions, >> > adding comments and changing indentation. I'd really like to see what >> > *you* think is the best way to write this code. The lessons learned >> > from this exercise could then be applied to other code we write in the >> > future. >> >> Okay, I took the challenge and produced a modified version of my >> earlier code where I removed what I considered to be redundant >> comments and did a little more renaming. You can see it >> athttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureSnake.html. Feedback is >> welcomed! >> >> I also started documenting some Clojure coding guidelines aimed at >> making code more readable >> athttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureCodingGuidelines.html >> and would appreciate feedback on these. I expect there will be cases >> where not following these is justified, which is why I refer to them >> as guidelines instead of rules. >> >> -- >> R. Mark Volkmann >> Object Computing, Inc. > > > -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---