On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, lpetit <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You should consider using docstrings for documenting functions

Good suggestion. I've changed my code to do that. I also noticed that
I had forgotten to replace special characters with built-in entities
in my HTML, so that is fixed now. The new version is at
http://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureSnake.html. What else
would you do different in this code? Do you think it still contains
too many comments?

> On 29 déc, 16:45, "Mark Volkmann" <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Mark Volkmann
>>
>>
>>
>> <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I would like to produce a version of the snake code that could serve
>> > as an example of the kind of code that the Clojure community thinks is
>> > "good". Unless it's part of an exercise to produce the shortest code
>> > possible, I think we should always write Clojure code with a goal of
>> > making it as easy as possible for others to read, while not attempting
>> > to serve as a Clojure tutorial. Again, my goal here is to get more
>> > developers to give Clojure a shot.
>>
>> > My challenge to everyone on the list is to start with any version of
>> > the snake code you've seen and make it as readable as *you* think it
>> > should be by doing things like renaming variables and functions,
>> > adding comments and changing indentation. I'd really like to see what
>> > *you* think is the best way to write this code. The lessons learned
>> > from this exercise could then be applied to other code we write in the
>> > future.
>>
>> Okay, I took the challenge and produced a modified version of my
>> earlier code where I removed what I considered to be redundant
>> comments and did a little more renaming. You can see it 
>> athttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureSnake.html. Feedback is
>> welcomed!
>>
>> I also started documenting some Clojure coding guidelines aimed at
>> making code more readable 
>> athttp://www.ociweb.com/mark/programming/ClojureCodingGuidelines.html
>> and would appreciate feedback on these. I expect there will be cases
>> where not following these is justified, which is why I refer to them
>> as guidelines instead of rules.
>>
>> --
>> R. Mark Volkmann
>> Object Computing, Inc.
> >
>



-- 
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to