Zitat von Olivier Delannoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/26/07, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zitat von protein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
Probably not unless you write such a generator. The youngest entry in
devcpp CVS is 23 month old and the 4.9.9.2 beta release is probably
not getting an update, anymore, but it not very stable. The v4 version
as an alternative download is close to unusable, too.
Not too many chances, I'd say.
Some suggest CodeBlocks instead but what shall be the impression of a
software that is _only_ available via CVS because its authors do not
dare to make a release :-/
I'd suggest to use VCexpress as editor and compile on command line.
I don't think code blocks can be compared to VC Express.
Surely not but it also has not generator in cmake and not even a
current stable release. The explanation on the codeblocks site is just
a lame excuse for a missing release management. But that's not
on-topic here.
I think VCExpress is not a solution that can be used instead of code
blocks.
It terms of cmake, it is (on windows).
VC is probably never going to be available on UNIX
So what? You can use KDevelop, then.
code blocks is
Where is it available. Some random CVS dump doesn't really count
unless there is a statement from the developers that a particular
version is known to work in a decent way (usually known as release).
plus VCExpress cannot be used with gnu compiler suite or
other compiler suites. That is something supported by Code Blocks.
Wasn't there something about external Makefile projects? In this case,
it would, although cmake doesn't support this (yet?) just like the
whole codeblocks thing.
HS
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
