Hi;
>> C*RAVE+(1-C)*UCT
>>
>
> This has been my understanding. However, I am surprized to find out that
> people have been setting C close to one, according to Petr and Oliver's
> postings, which is essentially AMAF. MF apparently is doing something
> different.
>
>
As explained by Aja, I did not mean that; I meant that we use UCT with a
coefficient 0 in
front of the UCB term +C_{uct} sqrt ( log( ...) / ...).
Best regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@dvandva.org
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
