Best,
Louise
At 06:06 PM 8/19/03, you wrote:
How interesting! So does this lend support to the "realist" as to why Marbury didn't seek the "justice" that Marshall's own opinion said he was entitled to (though not from the SC)?
sandy
At 05:41 PM 8/19/2003, you wrote:
August 19, 2003
Dear Sandy,
The Circuit Court in Washington, D.C. had jurisdiction ~ which had survived the Repeal Act of 1802. Susan Bloch recently wrote a piece about this. This court also had explicit mandamus power for cases against federal officials, power the Supreme Court would go on to hold exclusive.
Best,
Louise
At 05:05 PM 8/19/03, you wrote:
He did not. As is true of everything else about Marbury, there's a debate between legal realists--i.e., he didn't because it would have disserved the interests of the Federalist Party--and legalists--he didn't because in fact there was no lower court that had jurisdiction.
sandy
At 04:04 PM 8/19/2003, you wrote:
I apologize if this question is old hat to many of you. Does anyone know off the top of his or her head if Marbury sought a writ of mandamus in a lower court after losing in the Supreme Court? Thank you in advance for any help on this issue.
Mike Allen
Michael P. Allen
Assistant Professor of Law
Stetson University College of Law
1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
Phone: (727) 562-7360
Fax: (727) 347-3738
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]