Others have suggested even if the quote is apocryphal (it's hard not to think so) that 
it accurately describes Jackson's position.  I am not certain that is the case.  
Robert Remini suggests, with some authority, that Jackson never would have said it 
because he would not have accepted the Court’s self-appointed role as the final 
arbiter of political questions (p. 30 [at Note 50] in The Legacy of Andrew Jackson).  
(It may accurately characterize his views toward the Indian question.)  This question, 
undoubtedly, is a matter of much debate.

The letter quoted by Keith Whittington is from April 7, 1832, to John Coffee.

Richard Dougherty
University of Dallas

Reply via email to