On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Martin Minow wrote: > > http://www.cryptography.com/intelRNG.pdf. > > The one problem I have with the RNG, based on my reading of the > analysis, is that programmers cannot access the "raw" bitstream, > only the stream after the "digital post-processing" that converts > the bitstream into a stream of balanced 1 and 0 bits. It not only does that, it hashes the thing using sha-1. For all we know, the thing might be producing unacceptably small amounts of entropy for crypto purposes but large enough amounts that it hardly ever repeats. The work on the studying the output of Intel's RNG has only had accessed to the post-processed output, plus I believe a file directly from Intel which was claimed to be unprocessed output. Yeah ... right. If Intel wants people to trust them, they should quit acting like they're coving for bad engineering. -Bram
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (RNG) ... Dave Del Torto
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (... Eric Murray
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Gen... Eric Murray
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Bill Stewart
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Gen... Eric Murray
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (... lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Martin Minow
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Arnold G. Reinhold
- RE: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Lucky Green
- RE: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (... Jeff Gilchrist
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (... lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- RE: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generator (... lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Generat... Ben Laurie
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number Gen... Ted Lemon
- Re: [PGP]: PGP 6.5.2 Random Number... Arnold G. Reinhold