-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 99-10-29 12:06:16 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>Same for me. My parents bought our home in 1955 for $20,000. My mother still
>lives there (only the SECOND house she's ever lived in!). When my father
>died three years ago, she had the house appraised...it came in at $250,000.
>And that is the MEDIAN home value for that township! Sure, some of that
>increase is inflation, but an awful lot is real-estate speculation...

Some places more than others ...  My father's aunt bought a Victorian house
in San Francisco's Mission district for a flat $5000 in 1953.  Today it's
valued at $1 million.

In 1979 I rented a large one-bedroom flat for $225.  By 1999 its rent rose to
$2250.
In 1995 my rent for an in-law (studio) apartment was $425.  Today I pay $1050
for a
studio apartment.  That after having been evicted twice, from two different
apartments, by barracuda-like real estate speculators who bought both
buildings in which my wife and I were tenants and immediately evicted all
residents on zero or flimsy grounds, in order to jack up the rents legally
under our "rent control."  (CONTESTING an eviction handled by a corporate
real-estate "eviction specialist" lawyer, in an action to be heard by judges
who are also slumlords, in a city where real estate speculators are lobbyists
and the mayor's greatest campaign contributors, is as futile an enterprise as
fighting a determined hostile takeover by a multinational -- the onslaught is
as rapid, systematic, and ruthless as Dresden's bombing, and the average
working-class tenant just can't afford the expensive attorneys' fees for the
extremely time-consuming litigation.)  On the other side of the scales, the
average wage in San Francisco in 1979 was $7.50 an hour.  In 1999, twenty
years later, the average wage --whether you're a McDonald's clerk who doesn't
speak English or a computer-literate office manager with a college degree and
twenty years experience-- is $7.50 an hour ... ZERO % increase versus 1000%
-- and the odds are high that your employer here is also heavily invested in
real estate.

"Property--" if the owner of real property doesn't personally OCCUPY it,
doesn't care about the health, safety or comfort of those who DO, and only
uses it as a "token" in trades no different from stock-market shares,
profiting from nothing but its transfer--
"--is THEFT."  Kill the lawyers, yes, but don't forget that the landlords are
next in line.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to