On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Stefan Behnel, 16.11.2010 12:46: >>> when I try to hg push to cython-devel, I keep getting this: >>> >>> """ >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> SyntaxError: Error expanding 'sessionvars%urlparameter' >>> """ >>> >>> Trac seems to be broken, too. Has anything changed on the Cython VM since >>> yesterday that could trigger this? >> >> hg is back to normal since William cleaned up the disk space. trac is still >> down, it seems. >> >> Robert, since you set up most of the infrastructure (IIRC), could you take >> an attempt at the migration to boxen? > > So, I've been thinking about this, and one of the reasons we're using > the current setup is that it requires very little administration from > me, as I am essentially leaching of the sagemath.org infrastructure. > Moving things to boxen would be a bit more administration on our part, > but still not too bad, and I know William is a happy enough Cython > user to be fine with continuing to host us :). However, I'm wondering > if this would be a ripe occasion to making the leap to something like > http://code.google.com. Currently, our infrastructure consists of > > 1. The web site > 2. Trac > 3. Wiki > 4. Repositories > 5. Buildbot > 6. Mailing lists > > Currently we're hosting 1-5, and 6 is being hosted by codespeak.net > (for cython-dev) and google (for cython-users). I think it may be > worth considering moving 2-4 elsewhere, as there is little loss and > they are the higher-maintenance (from an administrative point of view) > items, and features such as code review tools would be nice to have as > well. Trying to use launchpad was painful, so this decision shouldn't > be taken lightly, but I think we can do better. Of course > code.google.com isn't the only option, but even trying to be unbiased > about it I think it's a very good option, and > http://www.dataliberation.org/google/code-project-hosting factors into > it as well. > > In terms of the website itself, I think we should keep hosting that > (for maximum flexibility, and it's easy to administer), and there > isn't much of an option for 5 (though steps should be taken to reduce > its load).
Robert has asked me to reply what I think about google code and github, since sympy has used google code since the beginning, e.g. last couple years, so I wrote this blog post about comparing Google Code and GitHub: http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/11/google-code-vs-github-for-hosting.html Ondrej _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
