On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Tim Bunce wrote: > FYI > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Nigel Horne <n...@bandsman.co.uk> wrote: >> ! DBD::Pg 2.6 2.17.1 > > Let's review version number math: > > 2.6 = 2.600000 > 2.17.1 = 2.017001 > > 2.600000 > 2.017001
Looks like it should have been 2.6.0: 2.6.0 = 2.006001 2.17.1 = 2.017001 2.006001 < 2.017001 Version number suck. And clearly, three-version numbers suck harder. Best, David
