Hi Richard,
My last answer to that thread since it could evolves that way for years :) It is all about definitions and our views of these things > I said that each Wikipedia category is a skos:Concept. The Wikipedia > category system is a concept scheme, in the SKOS sense. There are no > “named entities”, or “relations” in a concept scheme. > It is what I was saying: a Wikipedia Category can be: a named entity (Elvis), a concept, a relation, and possibly other things. So it is why I was making sure that all these three things where concepts for you (because you said *all*). However it seems clear now that it is not (at my standpoint, and at yours). > The category "Berlin" is still a concept. It might have a > corresponding named entity somewhere, but that's another story. The > named entity is not part of the concept scheme. Totally agree that Berlin is both a named entity and a concept. It is part of the gray area between concepts and named entities. Take care, Fred ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
