Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:13:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftp.debian.org: bad sections for libselinux binary packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2005 11:21:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 04:21:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dixsept.loria.fr [152.81.9.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6RPj-0002dp-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:21:27 -0700
Received: from vlefevre by dixsept.loria.fr with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E6RPZ-0003vD-MN; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:21:17 +0200
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:21:17 +0200
From: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp.debian.org: bad sections for libselinux binary packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9-vl-20050808i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
libselinux1-dev is currently in section libs instead of libdevel,
and so on. The control file is correct.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libselinux.html says:
There were override disparities found in suite unstable:
* libselinux1: Override says libs - optional, .deb says base - required
* selinux-utils: Override says libs - optional, .deb says admin - optional
* libselinux1-dev: Override says libs - optional, .deb says libdevel -
optional
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10-20050517
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:13:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:13:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EExUS-0002l0-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:13:32 -0700
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl
([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EExUQ-0000HS-UL; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:13:30 +0200
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EExUP-0007HE-Oz; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:13:29 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:13:29 +0200
To: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftp.debian.org: bad sections for libselinux binary packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:21:17PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> libselinux1-dev is currently in section libs instead of libdevel,
> and so on. The control file is correct.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libselinux.html says:
>
> There were override disparities found in suite unstable:
> * libselinux1: Override says libs - optional, .deb says base - required
> * selinux-utils: Override says libs - optional, .deb says admin - optional
> * libselinux1-dev: Override says libs - optional, .deb says libdevel -
> optional
Fixed.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
