Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:02:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftp.debian.org: libselinux1 needs to be priority "important"
or "required"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 May 2004 16:57:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 30 09:57:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.140]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BUTd6-0000sH-00; Sun, 30 May 2004 09:57:48 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO lkcl.net) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@81.155.76.36 with
poptime)
by smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 May 2004 16:57:16 -0000
Received: from highfield ([192.168.0.223]:32993 helo=lkcl.net)
by lkcl.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34 #1)
id 1BUSyS-0000zo-4n
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:15:48 +0000
Received: from lkcl by lkcl.net with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1BUTa7-0001at-1P; Sun, 30 May 2004 16:54:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp.debian.org: libselinux1 needs to be priority "important" or
"required"
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 16:54:42 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.0.223
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
hello, hello,
please see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=21wcZ-2QH-23%40gated-at.bofh.it&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dlinux.debian.devel
or equivalent for details.
the issue is that libselinux1 is presently on "override" by
ftp.debian.org to "optional" from its priority of "required".
it's really crucial that libselinux1 be given a priority of
"required".
a number of Debian / SELinux upstream patches are being held back
because developers and maintainers refuse to violate Debian Policy
2.5 (or something) regarding making "required" packages Depend
on "optional" packages.
therefore, those packages (pam, coreutils) are also holding
back _other_ packages and the whole thing is a complete mess
because it's all critically dependent on getting libselinux1 to
"required" status.
heeeeeelllllpppp!
please see http://open.hands.com/~lkcl/selinux/debian/status.current.txt
for a reasonably complete status list that demonstrates the hold-up.
thank you.
l.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux highfield 2.6.6-selinux1 #5 Tue May 18 16:33:29 GMT 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251749-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:02:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:02:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EExJV-00047y-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:02:13 -0700
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl
([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EExJU-0008LP-BB; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:02:12 +0200
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EExJS-0006tm-R2; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:02:11 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:02:10 +0200
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftp.debian.org: libselinux1 needs to be priority "important" or
"required"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 04:54:42PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> hello, hello,
>
> please see:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=21wcZ-2QH-23%40gated-at.bofh.it&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dlinux.debian.devel
>
> or equivalent for details.
>
> the issue is that libselinux1 is presently on "override" by
> ftp.debian.org to "optional" from its priority of "required".
>
> it's really crucial that libselinux1 be given a priority of
> "required".
Done yesterday on request of the maintainer.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
