On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 at 01:17:36 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> And as you said, since we only use the POSIX subset, I thought it would
> be an improvement to use awk, and not fail in even the above situation.

I don't recall why I used mawk in b0b8e3e88fecf2f8f5f5a3ad39b68e56a9e53427,
but it might be simply because it was advertized as “smaller and much
faster than gawk” in addition of being ‘Priority: required’.  Fair
enough, exectution speed is probably irrelevant for an interactive
completion script :-)

-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to