On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:08PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > If these patches are for the development version of wpa_supplicant, > should they not be merged into upstream CVS, so that next time I take a > snapshot, there is no need to carry along a large patch series?
It seems to me that the patches are for 0.4.8. > This is no defect, rather a wishlist item, IMHO. well, some of the patches makes wpa_supplicant work on some machines. So in some cases, they might be useful or even required. > >wpasupplicant is missing a number of patches which can be found at: > >http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/wpa_supplicant/ > > > >for me personally most important is that one (which makes wep w/ orinoco > > based cards work again): > > > >wpa_supplicant-wep-key-fix.patch > > > > Please provide a distinct bug report for that issue. I remember something.. wait. I think this would be this bug: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/wpasupplicant/+bug/37396 But I'm not that sure. > >furthermore I applied: > >wpa_supplicant-assoc-timeout.patch > >wpa_supplicant-auth-fallback-v4.patch > > > > Why? I'm a bit confused as well. Who wrote this patch? Who to contact him and have they already been submitted/discussed upstream? Gruesse, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]