Hi Norbert
2010/3/8 Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at>: > On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: >> I am not entirely convinced that this patch needs to be added to the >> TeXlive Debian package; I would rather put it in the pTeX JIS font >> package, since that package provides the rml and gbm fonts. > > But that package would need to change a file of ours, that seems like > a bit a pain. Alternatives? I am not sure ... Alternative would be dh_installtex, IMHO. >> I would add the following lines in ptex-jisfonts/rules: >> >> dh_install cid-x.map /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/arphic/ >> dh_installtex --flavor=map:config_for_all_maps map=Map,cid-x.map >> >> The problem now is that dh_installtex also creates faulty lines in >> pdftex.map. If we can fix either cid-x.map or dh_installtex to have > > dh_installtex??? Does not crete any faulty lines, it is updmap, right? > > I am somehow lost ATM. Indeed, it is updmap. Sorry for the confusion. If we choose dh_installtex inside ptex-jisfonts instead of modifying texlive-base, then we will have to modify cid-x.map to get it working nicely with updmap. > I thought this issues is solved with addint the two maps to the > config file. > > Did it create a different/new problem, Danai? The patch by Yoshihito that you just applied works, yes. No worries, it doesn't add any new problems. I was just thinking how we could use the current Debian infrastructure such as dh_installtex instead of directly modifying the dvipdfmx file. Personally I think that it would be best to have the font packages control their own entries in dvipdfmx instead of texlive-base, but YMMV. It would also solve the problem that Yoshihito raised, i.e. what if you make a local modification? Best regards -- Danai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org