(I'm afraid to feed the troll) 2013/5/30 Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it>: > On May 30, Gergely Nagy <alger...@balabit.hu> wrote: > >> I never quite understood why people seem to think systemd upstream is >> uncooperative (well, apart from the whole non-linux porting deal, where >> their stance is completely understandable too). My experience so far > There is also the "kill features Red Hat does not care about" deal,
Do you have an example? > and the "invent a new a configuration files scheme because it better > suits RPM and Red Hat policies" deal. Do you have an example? I have a example that show systemd taking non-RH solutions: /etc/hostname [ref] [ref]: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-new-configuration-files > Upstream is very cooperative, as long as your needs align with the ones > of Red Hat. examples? Regards -- Mathieu Parent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFX5sby+c5JAabcZoaByv_=jR5FtYv=0f+lqdrxb4fiwhgx...@mail.gmail.com
