Mathieu Parent wrote: > 2013/5/30 Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it>: > > and the "invent a new a configuration files scheme because it better > > suits RPM and Red Hat policies" deal. > > Do you have an example?
I think he's referring to the etc-overrides-lib semantics that systemd uses for configuration files. But it's wrong to describe that as "better suits RPM and Red Hat policies"; it's simply a better system than always having all configuration files in /etc and expecting users to possibly modify those same files, for reasons that are not specific to Red Hat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369922163.3628.75.camel@glyph.nonexistent.invalid
