Am Freitag, 28. November 2014, 09:28:39 schrieb Matthias Urlichs: > Hi, > > Martin Steigerwald: > > Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 22:30:15 schrieb Vincent Bernat: > > > ❦ 27 novembre 2014 22:02 +0100, Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> : > > > > And well, I also wonder why systemd --user functionality is in the > > > > *same* > > > > binary than the PID 1 stuff… but well… > > > > > > Wild guess: because it manages processes like PID 1? > > > > That kind of exchange isn´t productive > > You mean the "wild guess" part? Yes, it's not, but you have to admit that > "I wonder why systemd --user is the same binary as systemd --system" kindof > asks for that kind of response – after all, the answer should be obvious; > it's not as if we started discussing what systemd does (and how) yesterday.
Well, it doesn´t get any more productive. And if you read and understand one of my previous posts it would be obvious *why*. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
