On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:21:37PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > > No. A license may treat different catagories of people differently so > > > long as each category's freedoms fit under the DFSG. For example, > > > this license abides by the DFSG: "This software is licensed under the > > > GPL and the BSD licenses. If you are an educational institution, you > > > may abide solely by the terms of the BSD license. Everyone else must > > > abide by the GPL." > > > > > > It would be ridiculous to say that it didn't. > > > > Right, > > Okay, good. So, we have established and agreed that a license doesn't > discriminate under the DFSG even if it treats different parties > differently SO LONG as all the treatments comply with the DFSG.
That's not quite it; in this case one of the treatments is available to everybody AND meets the DFSG. Cheers, Nick -- Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone is speaking well of you. How unusual!