Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote: > > QPL is DFSG-free iirc, can JpGraph go in main despite the fact it can > > be used also under the terms of JpGraph Commercial License? > > The DFSG-freeness of the QPL is currently under renewed debate on this > list.
I think after Henning's recent posts, it's now clear that the QPL is not problematic after all, because the forced publication requirement can be evaded entirely.
