On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:31:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote: > > > QPL is DFSG-free iirc, can JpGraph go in main despite the fact it can > > > be used also under the terms of JpGraph Commercial License? > > > > The DFSG-freeness of the QPL is currently under renewed debate on this > > list. > > I think after Henning's recent posts, it's now clear that the QPL is > not problematic after all, because the forced publication requirement > can be evaded entirely.
Please review my recent message to this list, subject "QPL clause 3 is not DFSG-free". -- G. Branden Robinson | You can have my PGP passphrase when Debian GNU/Linux | you pry it from my cold, dead [EMAIL PROTECTED] | brain. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Adam Thornton
pgpddYKCZlH3A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
