* Steve McIntyre: > Please, no. We've already had long, tedious discussions about what > "software" means. Don't go trying to change the meaning of "program" > too. If you think that the places where we currently talk about > "program" are unclear and should say "software", then propose a GR to > get them changed. We ship lots of things that are NOT programs...
Exactly, and we still require that these things are properly licensed under some DFSG-free license. The interpretation I outlined is certainly not new. It reflects the current practice, and I think we're in a pretty good position as far as compliance is concerned. Even the notorious GNU FDL issue is not a real problem here (beyond the invariant section business) -- the GNU FDL requires open formats. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]