Le Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 09:20:19AM -0500, Clark C. Evans a écrit : > > | without contemporaneously requiring end users to enter into > | a separate written license agreement for such enhancements > > Ok. So, this language iss the one under debate I guess. > Simply putting on a license text isn't sufficient, you need > to *require* end users to *enter* into a *written* agreement.
Hi, this is exactly the key point. In my understading, “to enter into a written license agreement” can be done by receiveing a license text, reading it and accepting it. If one can read it, it is written. But I am not a native speaker. If it is the meaning of the Internet2 license that both parties must sign a document in order to “enter into a written license agreement”, then it is not a free license. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120207082713.gd24...@merveille.plessy.net
