Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org> writes: > Change from the original BSD-3-Clause is that the originally second > condition is merged/simplified with the first, and the third is > renamed. > > What short name should I assign to it?
I would advise that the name should not invite confusion with the existing license texts that actually are published prominently for the Berkeley Standard Distribution. In other words, if this is not identical with an existing widely-known BSD license text, don't use BSD in the name. You could instead choose a short name that is specific to that work. e.g. “License: CISCO-CSA”. -- \ “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. | `\ Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 | _o__) | Ben Finney