On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:17 AM Morten Bo Johansen <m...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> On 2016-06-13 Nicolas George wrote: > > > As I already explained twice, a solution that requires a > > different action when it is a mailing-list and when it is not > > is not an acceptable solution. > > Why not? Don't you know when you are corresponding on a mailing > list or not? You only need to switch between 'r' and 'L'. And > if some person on a mailing list in rare cases specifically > request a CC, then you also have to remember 'g'. That is not > too hard to manage? > > > The solution I advocate does not have this issue. > > Your solution is completely hopeless. You want people to > configure their MUAs to insert "Reply-To" headers on a per > mailing list basis to avoid your CCs? Many (most?) MUAs can't > even be configured this way. > > Morten > > Hear, Hear! Morten has put his finger on it. In both his paragraphs. Mark
