On 2016-06-13 Nicolas George wrote: > As I already explained twice, a solution that requires a > different action when it is a mailing-list and when it is not > is not an acceptable solution.
Why not? Don't you know when you are corresponding on a mailing list or not? You only need to switch between 'r' and 'L'. And if some person on a mailing list in rare cases specifically request a CC, then you also have to remember 'g'. That is not too hard to manage? > The solution I advocate does not have this issue. Your solution is completely hopeless. You want people to configure their MUAs to insert "Reply-To" headers on a per mailing list basis to avoid your CCs? Many (most?) MUAs can't even be configured this way. Morten